October’23 – Nominated By YA
Nominations
- The Truman Show – 0 Votes
- Good Will Hunting – 1 Vote
- Ford Vs Ferarri- 1 Vote
- Eye In The Sky – 2 Votes
Plot Synopsis
“Eye in the Sky” is a 2015 British thriller film directed by Gavin Hood and written by Guy Hibbert. The movie provides a riveting look into modern warfare, specifically the use of drone technology, and delves deep into the moral, ethical, and political dilemmas that come with it.
Plot Synopsis:
Colonel Katherine Powell (played by Helen Mirren) is a UK-based military officer in command of an operation to capture high-level terrorists in Nairobi, Kenya. Through remote surveillance and on-the-ground intel, they locate the targets within a safe house.
As Powell’s operation progresses, the objectives shift from “capture” to “kill” when they learn that the terrorists are planning a series of suicide bombings. To execute this, they decide to employ a drone strike. The strike becomes complicated when a young girl enters the kill zone to sell bread, potentially becoming collateral damage if the missile is launched.
Lieutenant General Frank Benson (played by Alan Rickman), overseeing the mission with government officials in a London boardroom, and drone pilot Steve Watts (played by Aaron Paul), located in the US, are then thrust into a moral and ethical debate. The film primarily revolves around the weighing of one life against many. The decision-makers grapple with whether to proceed with the strike and potentially kill the innocent girl to prevent a larger imminent terrorist attack.
Throughout the film, the characters communicate mostly through electronic means, and the tension rises as the clock ticks, emphasizing the immediacy and real-time decisions required in such military operations. The situation draws in various stakeholders, including politicians, lawyers, and military personnel, each bringing their perspective and biases to the table.
Themes:
“Eye in the Sky” delves deep into the ethical quandaries of modern warfare. It questions the cost of collateral damage, the nature of decisions made from a distance, and the impact of technology on the humanity of warfare. The film lays bare the intricacies of weighing individual lives against the greater good and the bureaucratic intricacies that come into play during life-and-death decisions.
The narrative challenges the audience to contemplate the morality of their own choices in such a situation, making it a thought-provoking watch.
Average Scores
Enjoyable | Plot | Acting | Camera | Themes | Music | Casting | Wildcard | Total | |
Average Score | 3.75 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.23 | -0.25 | 5.66 |
Max Score | 5 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | +/- 0.5 | 11.5 |
Difference | 1.25 | 1.36 | 1.01 | 0.53 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.75 | 5.84 |
Individual Scores
Reviewer | Enjoyable | Plot | Acting | Camera | Themes | Music | Casting | Wildcard | Total |
MA | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.5 | 1.4 |
YA | 5 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0 | 8.05 |
ZA | 5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 6.95 |
KS | 5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 6.25 |